Buckling Behaviour of Literally Tapered Steel Columns using FEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65568/gujes.2026.020207الكلمات المفتاحية:
Lateral-Torsional Buckling ، Tapered Steel Member، Taper Ratio، Finite Element Analysis، Geometric Imperfectionالملخص
This paper presents the buckling behaviour of tapered columns which are widely used in structural engineering applications such as bridges and towers. Buckling of thinned structural members subjected to compression forces have been studied for long time, and the buckling loads for different boundary conditions have obtained mathematically by solving the differential equations for each case considering the moment of inertia is constant through the entire section, while in case of non-uniform cross section, tapered columns are more complex compared to prismatic sections. In order to solve these problems, numerical methods become the suitable tools, such as finite integration or finite element methods, or any other methods. Finite element analysis is presented in this paper in order to investigate the behaviour of the buckling columns by including initial imperfections. The columns are lineally tapered w-sections with variable moment of inertia about strong axis, variable moment of inertia in weak axis or both axis were not considered. Abaqus-2014 software was used to analyse the columns and the buckling loads were obtained for tapered different ratios. FEM analysis consists of four models for each selected w-section in order to investigate the effects of tapered ratio on the buckling load. Based on this investigation it is concluded that taper ratio significantly affects the critical buckling capacity for the same material properties and length. The exact effect depends on the boundary conditions and taper profile. The comparison of the buckling moment between prismatic section with the tapered section ranges from 4%-12% for W8×18 sections and 8%-20% for W14×30 sections
المراجع
[1] American Institute of Steel Construction, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, ANSI/AISC 360-22. Chicago, IL, USA: AISC, 2022.
[2] European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures-Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, EN 1993-1-1:2005. Brussels, Belgium: CEN, 2005.
[3] B. A. Boley and V. Zimnoch, “Lateral buckling of nonuniform beams,” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 567-568, 1952.
[4] A. Andrade and D. Camotim, “Lateral-torsional buckling of singly symmetric tapered beams: Theory and applications,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 586-597, 2005, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733 9399(2005)131:6(586).
[5] N. S. Trahair, “Interaction buckling of tapered beams,” Engineering Structures, vols. 62-63, pp. 174-180, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.040.
[6] Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Abaqus Analysis User’s Guide, Version 6.14. Providence, RI, USA, 2014.
[7] S.A. Ibrahim, Lateral torsional buckling strength of unsymmetrical plate girders with corrugated webs, Engineering Structures, 81, 123-134, (2014).
[8] A.K. Sabat, Lateral-torsional buckling analysis of steel frames with corrugated webs, Master Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden, (2009).
[9] A.Z. Abidin and B. Izzuddin, Meshless local buckling analysis of steel beams with irregular web openings, Engineering Structures, 50, 197-206, (2013).
[10] M. Basher, N. Shanmugam and A. Khalim, Web openings in horizontally curved composite plate girders, J. of Constructional Steel Research, 65, 1694-1704, (2009).
التنزيلات
منشور
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2026 مجلة جامعة غريان للعلوم الهندسية

هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




